Back and Forth!

Or is it "Up and Down"? Congress and/or the administration keep chasing one another around and around, each trying to outbid the other on how much funding they'll allow for Amtrak. Gasoline prices are on the way up again and many rail lines are reporting increased ridership but does this reach the brains (if there are any) of the administration? Some in Congress are trying to see the way clear to propose more than the president's budget wants to allow. Some talk about high-speed rail--when? (Exasperating as I read today of the French doing a high speed connection from Paris to Strasbourg reducing the rail time from four hours to two and a bit!) Some other proposals talk about providing milliions to run more trains between cities within 400 miles of one another. So what's supposed to happen to long-distance rail? Does that proposal cover the lines that provide service (through cars) from Chicago to Los Angeles or Chicago to Seattle or New Orleans to Los Angeles?

Midst all this someone did mention the difficulties posed by freight trains on the same track as passenger trains, that the freight companies haven't lived up to their agreement to give passenger trains priority. I can just see CSX or UP living up to that rule!!

A Last Ride?

Why is there such opposition to funding for Amtrak? Reading blogs or responses to articles about Amtrak reveals such a negative opinion of support for a national rail system (because that's what it amounts to) boggles the mind--or my mind, at any rate. The latest flurry I just finished reading was an unmitigated rant about taxpayers paying for others to ride: if I don't ride Amtrak why should I be taxed for those who do? If I don't have a car, why am I being taxed for roads to be constructed or maintained? That aspect of reasoning never seems to have occurred to those who oppose funding for Amtrak.

What's ahead for Åmtrak?

It's hard to know if Amtrak is on the right track or has been put off on a siding. There are new engineers handling the locomotive and I'm not sure if he knows the rules of the road or he's just going to feel his way along the track. Some news reports show improved ridership on some lines but there are still some crazies who think privatization is the way to go. What's the point of selling off your assets to create another bureaucratic nightmare? Adequate funding is what is desperately needed. Maybe if gasoline continues to be expensive the traveling public will wake up and take to public transportation.

A new leader (?) for Amtrak

Too long an absence from this post but the appointment noted today (8/30/06) of Alexander Kummant as president and CEO of Amtrak deserved some comment. Mr. Kummant comes to Amtrak with a railroad background, except that maybe it's the wrong background. He previously served as a Regional VP of Union Pacific! He also served as UP's VP and General Manager of Industrial Products. It is reported that as a leader for both units, he "was rsponsible for substantially improved customer service, on-time delivery of client products, and significant gains in financial and operational performance". So he's supposed to work the same magic for Amtrak? I guess that means treat people (passengers) as products to be delivered on time and "gains in financial performance" translates to cutting dining car and sleeping car service because that will improve financial performance, right? His other, more recent position, was with Komatsu America, a supplier of construction equipment. Well, that might mean an ability to get some construction equipment for improving rail infrastructure (track, bridges).

Anyway he is supposed to build on the growing national desire for more and improved passenger rail service. I wish I could believe that someone who comes from UP would really do that. UP has not got a good record on handling their freight lines, how can Mr. K deal with improving Amtrak? Maybe his wife (a former senior executive with Santa Fe and BNSF) will exert a good influence over him.

It all remains to be seen. Given the state of travel nowadays rail in the US should be given priority. Improved service, like passenger trains given priority over freight, would be nice. Maybe people would be ready to trade in less speed (flying) for taking a train--none of the prolonged delays on security lines and you can still take something to drink (or get it on board) and your scissors, knitting needles, etc.

A partially new Amtrak

Home again after another, relatively short trip, on Amtrak. The ride from home to Indianapolis and Chicago and back again was pretty much on time. Our departure was about 40 minutes late but it didn't make any difference in our arrival in Alexandria; we had plenty of time before our departure for Indianapolis. Meals on all routes were served on the new plastic plates which weren't as bad as I expected. The plastic wasn't the soft picnic plate kind of thing, even had a decorative border on it. Coffee served in plastic with lids, not a bad idea as it prevented spilling hot stuff when you tried drinking while the train was going over rough track. Choosing roomettes for all sleeping space was a good idea as no one had a problem with climbing into an upper.

We had a good time in both cities, especially when it came to dining out: The Oceanaire, McCormick & Schmick in Indianapolis and Shaw's Crab House and Vong's Thai Kitchen in Chicago.

Since returning home I've been catching up on news items relative to Amtrak and its future. Lots of voices singing from different choirs though not as much from Mr. Mineta with his anti-Amtrak tirades.

What'll it be this time?

Without a doubt the fate of long distance American rail service is in trouble. The powers that be, those now in charge of Amtrak, have already made changes in the food service. No longer meals to be served on china with suitable implements with which to eat a meal; it's down to plastic. Certain foods will be prepared ahead of time and it looks as though we've seen the end of what was one of the lines best meals--the strip steak. This is supposed to save Amtrak "tens of millions of dollars" annually.

I suppose the next step will be an attempt to eliminate sleeping car service. Let them eat cake--let them ride in coaches.

What short-sightedness. How can we attract tourists, home-grown or from abroad, if we cut back on the very things which appeal to those who prefer to see our country at ground level? It has not penetrated the thick heads of those advocating saving money that the very things they're proposing will do nothing to save but will act to cause the system to lose money as travelers will opt for some other means of travel. Airlines? Good luck. As more and more of them go into bankruptcy their services are faltering, too. How about paying for your pillow, your blanket, your water? And traveling by car won't be any picnic, either, with the way gasoline prices are heading.

Go ahead, Mr. Laney. You and your fellow mis-handlers of Amtrak, cut off your noses to spite your faces. In the meantime, there are plenty of us calling curses on your deeds.

I'm about to sample some of the above as I take off on a trip to Indianapolis-Chicago-Washington and home. I'll sample the new meal service, find out how the sleepers are doing and try to talk to some of the railroad employees.

Whither train travel?

It's very dispiriting to think about train travel right now. Amtrak fired its president, David Gunn, supposedly because he wasn't running Amtrak the way the board (one person?) thought he should be. But it goes along with Sec'y Mineta's line of attack on Amtrak's long distance service. Gunn has been doing as well or better than could be done given the handicaps he had to work with. The man who fired him, David Laney, had only a few months earlier, complimented Gunn on the work he was doing; evidently he got the message from Mineta: Get rid of this guy--he knows how to run a railroad. As long as those who wield the power have their way there's little chance America has of ultimately keeping a transcontinental system as we once knew it.

The only thing saving any of it right now is the fact that Congress has already passed the subsidy funding for 2006. Soooo?

Lost opportunity

Who's to blame? I note the latest information regarding Hurricane Katrina and another mis-step by the New Orleans local authorities was their missing the offer by Amtrak to use the trains to evacuate residents. There were many missed opportunities to help those who had no other way to leave town and perhaps this is just another example of--I'll be kind and say 'overlooking' when I'm thinking 'ignoring' the role trains can play in disastrous circumstances.

How many people recall--or know of--the value of rail transportation during WWII? Troops were transported across the country, from one coast to the other, by rail. Are we so confident that the only way to do this nowadays is by air? We are constantly reminded of the threats by terrorists to air travel; might it not make a difference as to how we would always move the troops?

It's conceivable that more people will come to recognize the importance of keeping transcontinental lines alive as the administration nags at us to be more aware when we travel. I, for one, think the security measures at airports are wasteful, time-consuming, and will do little or nothing to deter a terrorist from carrying out whatever desperate measures he/she wants to inflict on the American people.

Hurricane Katrina wipes out rails

There's no doubt that when Katrina blew into the Gulf and onto the shores of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana it did as much damage as the tsunami in the far east. Towns were wiped out, homes and businesses disappeared, several hundred people lost their lives and those who survived may never recover their lives as they once knew them. Considering how much of the rail track runs so close to the shore and at water level across marshes it's no surprise that most of it is gone. The Florida to New Orleans run of the Sunset Ltd may never return considering how this particular line of the Amtrak system has been so disliked by the government.

To make matters worse a Republican Study Commission reviewed the budget and came up with a spending cut plan to help offset the billions which will be needed to rebuild what the hurricane destroyed. Not the least of these cuts, which cut back by millions every program in the budget, were those affecting transportation. Although the federal subsidy for Amtrak took a big hit, at least the highway 'earmarks' were cut back more proportionately. As usual short-sightedness reigns supreme and the administration and Congress can't see beyond their noses when it comes to passenger rail.

Of course, the freight lines will put some of their profits which runs into the billions into replacing what they need to enable the 'goods trains' to continue to transport cars, grain, coal, whatever is carried in containers from one coast to the other or from one border to the other.

Railroads and disasters

Very little comment has been made about the railroads, what happened to various lines (freight and Amtrak), services lost or cancelled, at the time of Hurricane Katrina, August 27-29. It's as though they didn't exist, didn't have tremendous jobs to do all along the Gulf coast and into New Orleans. Even as clean-up procedures began nothing was said in the media, other than references to the effect of shipping various products from the north down the Mississippi. What little I could learn was thanks to an email service that covers all sorts of transportation affairs and it had more to say about what was happening to the freight lines than what happened to Amtrak and the New Orleans station. Amtrak's own web site did report changes in schedules: the City of New Orleans would run only to Memphis, the Crescent to Nashville and the Sunset was totally wiped out from Florida to Louisiana, which we easily understood having ridden it in July. One news source did say something about Amtrak having offered rides out of New Orleans either at the time of the storm or shortly thereafter when living conditions deteriorated so badly but apparently nobody pursued the offer. There was such an overall snafu that it's no wonder lots of things got overlooked or ignored. (School buses left to the flooding when they could have been used to get people out of the city.)

I find it incomprehensible that people in the transportation business--buses, planes, trucks--seem to have lost track of the value of railroads. It's as though we never transported people in passenger cars on railroad tracks, that thousands, if not millions, of people once crossed the United States by rail. Today people look at you oddly when you refer to riding a train, especially if it's over a great distance. It surprised me no end to find several people as we crossed the country who were riding the train for the first time and enjoying it.

When I worked for Pennsylvania in the 1940s in a New York City ticket office, people bought tickets to go across the country despite the fact that we were involved in a world war. There were enough railroad cars to supply the military's needs as well as the private sector. It was still possible to call up an entire second section of the Broadway Limited if the passenger demand was there. Now Amtrak has to struggle to keep old equipment suitable enough for service.

End of Journey

The week of the convention was a busy one, sometimes too busy, as we had no time for seeing Portland on our own, thanks to arriving back from our excursions too late to go anywhere. The hotel was on the wrong side of the river, making it necessary to take the tram over to what I call the main part of town. We did do it one night so we could indulge in a dinner at McCormick & Schmitz on the river. It was nearly nine o'clock by the time we got there which made for a late dinner. Most of the excursion departures were correspondingly early so late night dining was not in order.

Some excursions were more interesting than others, either because of the destination or because of the equipment used to transport the riders. The trip to Wishram, Washington, (not a particularly historic or interesting destination) was outstanding because of the locomotives carrying the train, two very historic SP engines, a Daylight in brilliant orange and black and an SP&S in shiny black. It was a very long train and must have looked wonderful to chasers and people on the other side of the Columbia River. Our barbeque lunch at Wishram was an event in itself, quite marvelous as they handled so many people and never ran out of delicious barbeque, salad, dessert and liquid refreshment. There was another excursion that had a lunch as its end point but the ride wasn't as spectacular as the one to Wishram. Some of the private varnish accommodations we had were outstanding, one so-so. But I can honestly say it was overall a fine convention.

Returning home we rode the Empire Builder (noting new lounge car equipment) to Chicago where we caught the Lake Shore Ltd to New York for an overnight stay before taking the Silver Star back to Columbia. The last two sections were not very good, schedule wise. We should have been in New York about 3:30 but didn't get in until 7pm which shot my hopes for dining out somewhere special. We ended up dining in the hotel's restaurant and turning in early. The Star was a little late leaving New York the following morning and lost time all along the way, getting us in Columbia at 4:30am instead of midnight. Good thing we had our taxi waiting for us. Once in the house we just dropped everything and fell into bed.

More of the 9200 mile trip

It's so hard to understand why the administration persists in viewing rail travel or at least the major transcontinental portions of Amtrak as unproductive or that nobody rides these trains. When we went to lunch (before noon, shortly before arriving in Reno) we found it was already full and we had to leave our name on "the list". It meant a wait until 1:30. When we finally were called wouldn't you know our table companions were the non-stop laughing girl and her Dad.

The scenery from Truckee (Lake Tahoe) to Colfax was gorgeous. At one point the train was atop one ridge with a valley far, far below us, and we were traveling under a very slow order. The elevation was enough to kill Ron's hearing, something that is usually attributed to airplane flights. There was a brief stop at Colvas, elevation 2421 ft, 144 miles to San Francisdo--and it will take us 4 hours or so for us to get there. Eventually we were 2 hours late into Emeryville which didn't matter that much as it gave us plenty of time to find something to eat before our departure on the Coast Starlight at 10:12. The station and surroundings look very new but nothing like a restaurant in view. I asked a baggage handler if there was anything nearby and she said there was a food court on the other side of the tracks. Leaving our bags behind the ticket counter, we climbed the stairs to the bridge (elevator out of order) over the tracks and found a great mall with an international food court. We could have had Thai, Chinese, Indian, Vietnamese, any south of the border cuisine, straight American fast food--but we settled for some tasty fish and chips with a couple of beers. With a Borders book store right near by we stopped in for more stuff to read. Then it was back over the bridge to collect our bags---and got the bad news that the Starlight wouldn't arrive until 1:30 or 2 in the morning!!! How much more of this can we take?

Despite such a ridiculously late bedtime I was awake and up at 7:30; Ron was already up. Breakfast and some time in the parlor car lounge. We had an excellent view as we went around the Cantera (?) Loop where you can see the engines and the end of the train at the same time. Next came views of Mt. Shasta, equally spectacular. Got some good pictures, despite the windows. A news announcement said we'd be 5 hours late at Klamath Falls. At one point we passed the Los Angeles to Portland private varnish special off on a siding about 3/4 of an hour out of Dunsmuir. There were ten or more cars. If they follow us, they'll be even later into Portland.

We kept losing time all along the way as we had to pull over to sidings to let #11, heading south, or a local go by or get stuck behind a freight. Lunch and dinner ok, nothing remarkable, good table companions. When we finally got to Portland we collected our large green bag, shipped from Columbia, were met by a convention member and eventually were taken by the hotel bus to the Doubletree. It was 10:30 or later by the time we were in our room. We just showered and fell into bed!

9200 miles on the rails

It was a long, long trip on Amtrak but well worth it, if only for the chance to see how my version of Amtrak's problems differ from the administration's. We (my husband and I) were aboard a train daily from June 28 to July 15 with only a few hours in between portions of the trip in a station.

It did not begin well. Our taxi pick-up at home was prompt and we were at Columbia's station about an hour before the train was due. As soon as we checked our luggage (one piece going directly to our destination, Portland, Oregon) we saw the notice on the Arrivals/Departures board that the Silver Star was 2 1/2 hours late. No reason known for why it was so late. Since we had now something like 3 1/2 to 4 hours to sit in a station with no enhancements at all was almost unbearable and there was no place to walk to for some kind of diversion. When the Star finally arrived at 2:30am the few dozen passengers boarded as quickly as possible so as to get some sleep on the way to their various destinations. For us it was easy to tuck into our respective roomettes and sleep until we were ready to get up for breakfast in the dining car. Since we were now expecting to be in Orlando closer to noon than the scheduled 8:20am, we could take our time about everything. As we sped through the Florida countryside I was more than glad that we never thought to retire there--such dismal scenery.

Arriving in Orlando we had a relatively short wait for our departure on the Sunset Ltd, thank goodness. Orlando's station is decent enough but not one in which you'd want to spend several hours which would have been the case had we been on time. I guess Amtrak doesn't count on passengers having much of a layover so they don't have any amenities to offer beyond restrooms and a drinks dispenser. But the Sunset departed on time--1:45pm--and we were off on the second leg of our journey, New Orleans. Since we'd had no lunch we opted for the earliest dinner reservation, 5pm. Steaks, mixed veg, a baked potato, a salad, some Merlot wine, cheese cake and coffee more than made up for the loss of a mid-day meal.

A knock on my roomette door the next morning got me going; Ron was already up and dressed. The weather was foul, very heavy rain just about all the way to New Orleans. How nice to be dry and comfortable with somebody else doing the driving. I was glad to have my knitting as I was just about finished with the first of several books I'd brought along. We noticed herons and small flying birds in the vast bayous of Mississippi, occasional signs of man'w works, remnants of docks and at one point an enormous structure that appeared to have been an oil derrick--huge, sitting on stilts well above the water. The usual accumulation of freight trains coming and going, as well as right ahead of us, caused another delay, putting us in New Orleans about three hours late. Again it didn't matter: our departure on the City of New Orleans was scheduled for 1:45pm so we had little more than an hour to kill.

The station in New Orleans has had some considerable renovations since our last run through there. But it still seems to be in a little regarded area as there is only one newstand and one fast-food restaurant. The first class lounge, which we would have been entitled to use, was closed for fumigation purposes so we had to sit with the hoi-polloi in the general area. Not a problem, though, as we had a couple of interesting conversations, one with a young British woman who told of her experience with passport clearance when she entered the country (fingerprinting, etc) and the other with a couple, NARP members, who were completing the last leg of their round-the-country by rail, much like our own trip.

The City of New Orleans departed promptly but delays began as we barely left the station. There were several stops along the way to drop off or pick up passengers. No lack of passenger traffic. We spoke to more people about the Amtrak funding problem and none of them were aware of it. There wasn't much to comment on about this stretch, mostly farmland, but no more rain. We were in Chicago not only on time, but a few minutes early. At least it meant we could have lunch at The Corner Bakery which I'm convinced has the best sandwiches in the country. Since I hadn't slept well after about 4:30am I was glad to sit and snooze in the Metropolitan Lounge while Ron went out to photograph whatever he thought interesting.

As usual, another delay. This time in departing from Chicago. Supposed to depart at 1:50pm we didn't collect our bags and get a ride to the train until 1:20. After settling in our compartment (bedroom this time) an announcement asked coach passengers to occupy only one seat as others coming from the Lake Shore Ltd were boarding and the Zephy was booked solid! Another knife in Mileta's argument that no one rides Amtrak! We made a 7pm dinner reservation and had very enjoyable dinner table companions, though I suspect some topics (relating to the gov't) might have been inappropriate as he did contract work for companies like Halliburton. We had to set our watches back an hour as the next day we'd be on mountain time.

Up early and a good thing as the dining car was full when we went down; we had to put our names on the "call list". Not yet into Denver so the scenery was still flat, cattle and ranch land. Our breakfast table companions were delightful, two gentlemen, slightly younger than us, were from Toronto on their way to Salt Lake City for a barbershop quartet convention. Later we sat in the lounge car so as to get the best views of the mountains as we headed for Winter Park. The spectacular scenery brought lots of people to the lounge car where we sat until lunch time. With our table companions, Malinda and Gary Parks from near Sacramento, we had a great discussion about trains, outdoor life and their new home construction. Shortly after crossing into Utah we ran into signaling problems, forcing the train to sit for more than an hour. Nothing like being in the middle of a desert to stall! Of course this would mean another delay in our arrival at Emeryville.

Our dinner companions were the worst we've had in ages. In Chicago I had noticed a young woman and a severely handicapped man boarding, using the handicapped room. Although not wheelchair bound he was bent and twisted with a considerable lack of mobility. They were seated with us. No problem with the man, though he was very hard to understand as he had severe speech problems but his daughter was impossibly cheerful. She accompanied everything she said with laughter, suitable to what she was saying or not. It was the most awful dinner hour.

More later--------

No Rails?

I am trying to imagine the country without any transcontinental rail service which is probably a no-brainer for most people. I have, however, enjoyed too many rail journeys to think that, after my upcoming major trip, there might never be another. It is a possibility, given the present administration's view of what a railroad should be. As far as they're concerned we might just as well think of crossing the country by horse and wagon, I guess, since the airlines are all heading for bankruptcy and no one's doing much about that situation, either.

I'm not without some compunctions about the June-July trip. We had so many delays and interruptions last year that it's not impossible to have even more this year, especially on the way to Portland. Departing from Columbia at nigh on to midnight it's conceivable the Silver Star could be late--so on our way by one or two in the morning? Which, of course, means a late arrival in Orlando--or will they take us off at Sanford or Jacksonville for our next leg on the Sunset Ltd? Probably the run into New Orleans will be on time (it's the NO to LA that is so often late) and our departure for Chicago will be on time as that's the origination point for the City of New Orleans. Will it arrive in Chicago on time? We have nearly four hours before our departure on the California Zephyr but I don't know if there's much to do with that amount of time. I think most of Chicago's sights are pretty far from Union Station. Then it's on to Emeryville and five hours (if we're on time) there before we take the Coast Starlight to Portland. Maybe enough time to get into San Francisco for dinner?

I'm glad we arrive in Portland late in the afternoon: time to clean up, change and find a good dinner, not that that's a problem. I feel quite confident about restaurants in that city!

Given the hours of departure and return of the excursions we've signed up for I am dubious about how eager I'll be to go dining out every night. With Laura joining us I'd hate to be a wet blanket about going out for dinner. By the end of the week we'll all be ready to slow down. As she goes on to her Forest Service program in Idaho we head back to Chicago on the Empire Builder, then New York on the Lake Shore Ltd. An overnight in New York (no more as July is not my favorite time of year in the city) and return to Columbia the next morning, arriving in Cola at 11:55, home by one or so.

I don't know how much enthusiasm I'll have for any other trips this year!!

It don't get no respect!

Try as one might there just isn't any counter-attack to Sec'y Mineta's (and the administration's) fulminations about Amtrak. Talk about a bully pulpit. He's all over the country, meeting with this group and that--but no one else comes along with any rebuttals about what he and/or the White House really wants. Determined to dispose of Amtrak or any other nationwide passenger rail system they continue to paint Amtrak as a money losing corporation. I'd love to know how many rail passengers they have spoken to, other than commuters. I guess I've got a preconceived notion that traveling by rail can be a relaxing way to travel, certainly nowadays where airline travel is no longer what it used to be. Americans have become so overwhelmed by the notion that they should get to where they're going as quickly as possible--therefore fly--or by having complete control over how and when you get there--therefore drive yourself--that they've forgotten, if they ever knew, how great a train ride can be.

I'm about to take my fourth major trip with Amtrak and I'm looking forward to it as much as I used to anticipate a flight to anywhere.

Empty Trains??

The latest info I have found discrediting the current administration's disinterest in funding Amtrak is in the May 2005 issue of Railfan & Railroad. Under the Capitol Lines heading by Wes Vernon he reports that the "overall view in Washington is that there is little chance Amtrak is going to die" but he cautions that this should not lead to false optimism. Emphasis is placed on the importance of Amtrak's route through Montana: the Empire Builder contributes nearly $14 million annually to its economy. There is no parallel bus service on a 982-mile stretch from Spokane, WA to Minot, ND, and Greyhound buses don't stop anywhere between Billings, MT and Minneapolis.

A tour director who uses many of Amtrak's services says that if the long-distance services are eliminated, "the few surviving corridors will rapidly die due to a lack of connecting passengers and the vastly increased cost of carrying the full expense of the rump of Amtrak." NARP, the National Association of Rail Passengers, says trains are filled and Secretary Mineta's comments are not resonating with the people who are riding the trains. This same tour director offers the contrast between the operating subsidy of Amtrak with that of highway spending: $1.2 billion in 2004 with $133 billion in 2001--and 40% of that was not recovered from gas taxes.

Whither the trains? I'm probably repeating myself with the comparison of riding a train nowadays with flying somewhere. Yes, it's restricting me from traveling abroad but given the exchange rate that's no big loss. The difficulties involved with security at the airports still rankles me beyond reason so for now I'm more than content to travel about the US by Amtrak!

Memories of trains

The earliest is not of the train but the train station: Pennsylvania Station in New York City. My earliest trip was to Atlantic City for a summer holiday. At the age of six, more or less, I was not too conscious of the train ride but that station! Its huge size, the light streaming through what seemed like glass everywhere, people on the move through the concourse on their way to trains--the impression is unforgettable. Much later as a young woman I enjoyed going through the station just to enjoy that size and those people. There was also a cafe, the Savarin, where I could stop for lunch when working at Macy's, just across the street. Tearing down this magnificant building was the beginning of a strong historical preservation movement, not only in the city, but nationwide.

Sometime after its destruction I traveled on the Lehigh Valley RR, the Black Diamond, on my way to college. Another journey not too well remembered, though the sound of the steam engine as it whistled its way along Lake Cayuga echoed around the campus as long as I was a student.

My first job after graduation was with Pennsylvania RR as a ticket agent. I worked in a city ticket office on 47th Street in NYC, first as a telephone reservation clerk, then promoted to the front desk as an information clerk. The next step was becoming a ticket agent, a seller of tickets, maker of reservations, planner of trips! After a couple of weeks half a dozen of us (all females as there were no newly hired men--they were all off fighting WWII) were given a tour of the Penn RR equipment which meant a trip from NY to Chicago, Philadelphi and Washington, mostly so that we could become familiar with the various types of accommodations on Pennsy trains. In Philadelphia, Pennsy's home base, we attended some classes also. This was a dream job, ended only when the 'boys' began returning from service and it became "Last hired, first fired".

Not much railroading after that until I married a man who was as rail-conscious as I was. I had my history of working for Pennsy as well as loving train travel and he had a grandfather who worked for the railroad which meant he got to take lots of train trips.

Baaaad news

Talk about destroying fond memories. Everything I'm reading today is bad news for Amtrak. A country that once had the greatest rail system in the world is about to collapse--or will do so if the present administration has its way. A Passenger Rail Investment Reform Act was introduced in Congress on April 14 that is supposed to "breathe new life into the nation's inter-city rail service" and "improve Amtrak's operations nation-wide". So much is overlooked in the administration's determination to make these so-called improvements: the subsidies to roads and highways, to aviation--that to call the miniscule (by comparison) subsidy of Amtrak some kind of drain on the budget boggles the mind.

Not that this is a new notion for the Office of Management and Budget: they've been trying for 25 years to cut off funding but now the president has some congressional conservatives who believe the government shouldn't be subsidizing a corporations. BUT Amtrak was never created as a private enterprise business. It was founded by Congress to take over passenger travel service that the freight railroads had been operating at a great loss. And transportation needs have always been subsidized by government: building lighthouses, dredging harbors, and even, believe it or not, laying out the national highways. Subsidies for roads have doubled, for aviation nearly tripled. And for Amtrak--virtually flat.

For my part, I'm convinced the railroad traveling public has little idea as to what is happening. If things go from the present bad to worse, I'm going to distribute flyers on my next Amtrak trip explaining to the passengers what they are about to lose (if it's not already lost by then).

The past exists

Last night we three, father, mother and daughter, traveled a mini-memory path. We viewed a DVD of historic western rail trips and enjoyed reliving the experience of riding one or two of them. I guess the most memorable to me was our ride on the Durango and Silverton. Alas, this was back in a time when I wasn't keeping a travel diary so exactly when it was I can't tell but she was young enough to enjoy every minute of everything we did. It was, as I recall, an extended Western journey and our single day excursion on the D&S was only one of many highlights. We rode in an open car, the better to enjoy the scenery as the train skirted the river or creek or stream, and oohing and aahing over every turn in the track. There might well have been soot from the locomotive all over us when we returned but none of us would have cared.

The video we watched shows no evidence of a loss of interest in this bit of the past. Passengers, young and old, still get their thrills from the ride that is now more than a hundred years old. Who, back in the days when this was a working railroad, transporting the silver miners back and forth, that their route would be enjoyed by people in no way connected to the work of a railroad, but were just getting their kicks by riding an old narrow-gauge railroad.

Destroying Amtrak

It has become one of the present administration's goals to, as they put it, "reform" Amtrak. What they really want to do is destroy the national system. One of the earliest indications as to what was happening was noted in a Feb. 8 report out of Chicago that Sen. Dick Durbin said during a press conference in Chicago's Union Station that he couldn't think of a worse "idea than eliminating the only passenger rail service in America". He noted that the government subsidizes other forms of transportation (air, highway travel) and that it should also subsidize Amtrak which helps keep cars off the highways. What triggered this was the revelation that the budget GWB proposed the day before provides no operating funds for Amtrak and the president is pushing for privatization and for cutting unprofitable routes, which essentially means the transcontinental routes.

On Feb. 9 a report noted that the proposed cuts could end passenger trainservice in Arkansas. The Texas Eagle passes through Arkansas on its route between St. Louis and Texas. Rep. Marion Berry, D-Ark, called the cuts "illogical--infrastructure is the lifeblood of rural America. We cannot expect to eliminate transportation options for growing areas of this country and expect their econoies to continue to expand." Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark, said that he was concerned and thought that for the "President to cut vital programs such as Amtrak, while also calling for making his tax cuts permanent, is wrong."
Dr. Bill Polalr, president of Arkansas Rail, a 27-year-old passenger train advocacy group said the president's proposal is shortsighted. He thought if the president's budget were to be enacted, it would be "the end of Amtrak as we know it. . .it would be the end of passenger rail service in America and that is one reason that Congress won't allow that to happen." He plans on contacting congressmen around the state and lobbying officials whose towns may be directly impacted by a loss of commerce if routes are eliminated.

Next came Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's ride around the country (I wonder if he went by Amtrak?) "explaining" what the president had in mind. He persisted in saying that Amtrak is "dying and everyone knows it" but rejecting the notion that he's trying to help it do that. He is trying to convince the public that we're wasting money with a funding systemthat is "fundamentally irrational." He claims that it "runs money-losing routes and diverts cash away from repairs to cover operating losses." This was Feb. 14 in Chicago, Feb. 22 in Charlotte, NC, March 23 in Boston, March 25 in Detroit (at the railroad station--did he get there by train?) and who knows where next?